RJHuneke.com | Official Site of Author R.J. Huneke
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Tour
    • Press
    • Full Stack Marketer
    • Publications
  • Future Works
  • News
  • Publications
    • Cyberwar
    • Publications Listing
    • Impulsive Reviews
    • Short Fiction
    • Publications In Detail

Class Not Defined by Money But by Power Relations in the Workplace - By Aaron Meltzer

3/2/2012

0 Comments

 
By Aaron Meltzer

To make one thing clear in the beginning of this post, the definition of class that is described and used in the post comes from Michael Zweig, a professor of economics at Stony Brook University.

In our current conception of the word, class is generally defined as a subsection of the income distribution. We speak of class as divided between the lower class-those on the lower end of the income distribution-, upper class- those on the high end of the income distribution-, and middle class for those in the middle. However this obscures the real use of class. Class is understood as an economic principle. As per the experience of the average person not everyone interacts with the economy in the same way. Given our consumer-based view of the economy it seems only natural to divide people based on their purchasing power.

In my opinion, there is little to be gained from understanding economic divisions this way. What more do we understand about the economy knowing that some people have greater purchasing power than others? To be sure it is not something that should be ignored, but whether it should be elevated to one of the main divisions of society is doubtful. When people understand the division the populace with respect to their interaction with the economy, division by income distribution is associated with wealth, opulence, and power. After all, in our modern world money is by and large power. It is definitely true that those with more money wield more power in our society, but where did they get this wealth? The answer is also obvious; the wealthy gained their wealth from their jobs and investment. Given more wealth means greater returns for investment, in a certain sense wealth can beget more wealth. What needs to be understood is the mechanism between the original wealth and the greater resulting wealth.

One such source has already been mentioned, namely a job. More specifically, the wealthiest tend to be the head of companies or societal icons. Focusing on the former, we take for granted today that CEO’s are paid well. How could it be any other way? However theoretically speaking a CEO could be paid less than their workers. If under the hypothetical scenario a union is particularly powerful, this is possible. However it has never happened. Why it has never happened is the key. It has never happened because the heads of companies wield power. Notice in the previous description our poor CEO was only poor because the union was more powerful than he or she was. Therein lies the solution; wealth is accumulated by the most powerful. Societal icons owe their power to the fact that those they work for earn even more money, and given their scarcity they can demand large wages from their employers. Hence, a more fundamental and accurate way to define class is by the power relations in the workplace. The power relation is specified for the workplace because that is, of course, the only place wealth is generated and hence the only sector we are concerned with.

Using this definition, Zweig proceeds to define the class structure of the US in the following way: those who have little power, characterized as people who simply do what they are told in the work place is the working class. These are characterized as assembly workers, secretaries, certain teachers and so forth. Those who have some power to control their workflow but do not own the company is the middle class. They are characterized as professionals, lawyers etc. Finally there is the Capitalist class, who control and give guidance to companies. That said small business owners can still be placed in the middle class since their market environment, and thus what they need to do to stay afloat is often influenced by actions of other larger companies. Zweig proceeds then, using various data, to figure out how many people are in each class. The result is startling: the working class makes up 63% of the populace, the Capitalists 2%, and the middle class the remainder. In this conception, it is clear that the working class is the majority of the populace. As a side note exactly how these calculations are done, how to count people who are not working, and the ambiguities around the edges are dealt with in much greater detail in Zweig’s book The Working Class Majority.

The aforementioned definition helps us better understand the world around us. No better example is the attitude of Occupy Wall Street. Their rhetoric mainly revolves around income distribution. It is the 99% vs. the 1%. However I hardly think that the protesters, people angry about how their wages are flat or declining while their bosses earn ever-bigger bonuses, are protesting against Lady Gaga. Lady Gaga is probably in the 1%, she is likely in the upper class, and so by the previous definition she should be subject to protests too. However in our updated definition, the protestors are actually angry with the Capitalist class, of which Lady Gaga (unless she owns some product line) is not a part. Henceforth with our new definition we can point out a specific section of the populace without exception that is the actual subject of protest and anger, whereas in our previous definition we had to provide exceptions.

In sum, our current conception of class does a great disservice to our society as it attempts to grapple with rising income inequality and declining living standards for the working class. The media and politicians propagate it by constantly referring to the “middle class” as the section of income distribution most people belong to. A truck driver making a decent living does not experience events and does not have the same interests as a lawyer in the supposed upper middle class. One grapples with a boss bent on cutting wages the other searches for clients to boost his income. While both may potentially be in the same (although admittedly different ends) of the same income distribution, their experience in the workplace is fundamentally different. The lawyer may not need a union while the truck driver does. The lawyer may see a steady income while the truck driver struggles with bills. One is, in reality, in the working class, while the other the middle class, and this difference in power readily explains the difference in income and experience better than any whimsical division by income.

Aaron Meltzer is an Economics and Computer Science scholar attending Stony Brook University.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Tweets by @World2Philosoph
    Picture

    World 2 Philosoph (W2P)

     is a Blog dedicated to the interpretation of current events & news going on in the complex world.  Various minds take up the debate!  Bring on the critical thinking and the sharp philosophy.

    Archives

    January 2013
    March 2012
    February 2012
    July 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010

    Categories

    All
    1980
    2012
    2012 Election
    2012 Obama
    Album
    Amendment
    Arizona
    Beatle
    Beatles
    Beck
    Bible
    Bill Maher
    Bob Dylan
    Bush
    Business
    Capitalist
    Censor
    Censorship
    Change
    Charity
    China
    Cia
    Class
    Communism
    Country
    December 8 1980
    Deficit
    Democracy
    Democrat
    Drone
    Drones
    Dylan
    Economy
    Election
    Espionage
    Faa
    Fiction
    Freedom Speech
    Gandhi
    Giffords
    Ginsberg
    Give Peace A Chance
    Howl
    Huck Finn
    Human Rights
    Imagine
    Iran
    John Lennon
    Karma
    Lennon
    Life
    Lyrics
    Maher
    Mark Twain
    Middle Class
    Music
    National Security
    Negro
    New Edition
    New York City
    Nuclear Capacity
    Nuclear Scientist
    Nyc
    Obama
    Occupy
    Ono
    Owner
    Ows
    Palin
    Park
    Peace
    Peaceful
    Philosopher
    Political
    Politics
    Power
    Protest
    Quran
    Recession
    Reelection
    Republican
    Rhetoric
    Rights
    Rival
    Sawyer
    Song
    South Park
    Spy
    Spying
    Tax
    Taxes
    Twain
    United States
    Us
    Violence
    Wall Street
    Working
    Working Class
    World To Philosoph
    Yoko

    RSS Feed

eff, eff.org, electronic frontier foundation, digital new york, digital nyc, digital long island
eff.org, eff, electronic frontier foundation, digital rights, cyberwar novel, cyberwar, cyberwar by R.J. Huneke, R.J. Huneke, rj huneke, writer, fiction, thriller, sci-fi, 1984, orwell, ray bradbury
>HOME >ABOUT >THE NOVEL CYBERWAR >LIST OF PUBLICATIONS >NEWS >PUBLICATIONS HOME
Copyright © 2007-2020 R.J. Huneke, RJHuneke.com.  All Rights Reserved. This web site is powered by CMO Sync.
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Tour
    • Press
    • Full Stack Marketer
    • Publications
  • Future Works
  • News
  • Publications
    • Cyberwar
    • Publications Listing
    • Impulsive Reviews
    • Short Fiction
    • Publications In Detail